PROPOSAL FOR A CAPITAL BUDGET PROJECT

 

COMPUTER & SPACE SCIENCES BUILDING

EAST WING

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL

 

September 1, 2000

 

Rationale and Motivation

Background, Deficiencies & Need

Proposed Infrastructure Concentration

Process

Plan

Infrastructure Study

Project Resource Plan

Elements

                        Asbestos Abatement

Demolition plan

                        Mechanical Systems, e.g. chiller, heat exchange, piping, etc

                        Electrical Systems, e.g. UPS, generator, panels, rewiring

                        Fourth Floor Roof

                        Transformer Room

                        Telecommunications/High Speed Data Links

                        Qualitative Improvement of Hallways & Universal Areas

            Staging

Cost Estimate

 

C&SS Infrastructure Advisory Committee-

                Lawrence R. Bleau, Space Physics

            Timothy B. Falkinburg, Chair

            Alfred J.  Fay, IPST

            Dr. Christopher A. Shuman, ESSIC

            Dr. John D. Trasco, Astronomy

 

            With Assists from:

                        Jack Baker, Facilities O&M

                        Marlowe V. Leafty, Facilities - Electrical

                        John I. Vucci, Facilities – HVAC

                        Ed Hauprich, John Grey, Phil Meske, Facilities - Campus Projects                                         

                                                                               Planning

 

RATIONALE & MOTIVATION

 

This document provides a proposal to study, plan and renovate the infrastructure of the east wing of the Computer & Space Sciences Building (C&SS) in several stages.    The University, by implementing this proposal, will save a by-in-large structurally sound building with rapidly deteriorating electrical/mechanical infrastructure that has outlived its useful life.   A renewed facilities infrastructure in C&SS would enable the University and the College of Computer, Mathematical & Physical Sciences (CMPS) to:

 

·        first and foremost, renew the building for at least another thirty years – at a fraction of the cost of a new building

·        provide building systems that are much more efficient to maintain and run

·        update the technological capabilities of the building

·        retain and  attract valuable high tech personnel resources

·        compete more successfully for research grants for the programs located in the building

·        support additional research activities

·        improve the aesthetics of the facility

 

Renovating the east wing of the C&SS Building now should save this building – allowing successful integration with the Physical Sciences Complex proposed to be built in close proximity on lot DD.  In fact, integrating the old C&SS Building with the new Physical Sciences Complex by using shared and more efficient mechanical systems, and by providing a physical connection between the buildings, will help to enhance the campus’s and CMPS’s  high national ranking.  

 

To do nothing will cause irreparable harm to the C&SS Building and to the scientific research activities located within the building.  To do nothing does not address the prospective loss of valuable University human resources.  To wait too much longer may necessitate replacement of the entire structure.  To totally demolish this building and build a new structure probably is cost prohibitive to the campus. 

 

This proposal is similar in nature to recently approved capital projects such as the Art-Sociology, Hornbake Library, Jimenez Hall, Symons Hall, and Woods Hall buildings.

 

Please see Appendix A for pictures of the C&SS Building and a few problem areas.  Please see Appendix B for floor layouts of the east wing.

 

 

BACKGROUND, DEFICIENCIES & NEED

 

Housed in the east wing of the C&SS building and doing high level scientific research are elements of the Departments of Astronomy and Geology, the Earth Systems Science Interdisciplinary Center (ESSIC), the Institute for Physical Science and Technology (IPST), and the Space Physics group.   Current plans call for the construction of the Physical Sciences Complex and the relocation of Earth Sciences into a renovated Physics Building.  However,  CMPS anticipates a continued need for the east wing, and possibly the central wing of the C&SS Building. 

 

The C&SS Building was designed and built in several stages.   Much of the construction work for the east wing of the C&SS Building was performed in a time of restricted budgets with little concern for installing long lasting and environmentally sound infrastructure equipment and systems.   Most of these systems are highly inefficient and don’t meet today’s environmental standards.   See Appendix A for some examples of outdated equipment and deteriorating systems.

 

Numerous building problems are recorded with Facilities Work Control and the CMPS Dean’s Office about the C&SS Building, especially the east wing.  Many of these problems are related to asbestos, cooling & heating, electrical, plumbing, and appearance.   As an example, between January 1, 2000 and August 21, 2000, there were 150 reported hvac problems.  Of these, over one half were connected with the East Wing. 

 

The deteriorating infrastructure within the building inhibit normal work and research activities.  The ability of various CMPS departments located in C&SS to foster the evolving nature of research in the building is severely hindered.   The ability to attract and keep qualified researchers is hampered.  The capability to maintain and increase the campus’s and CMPS’s high national ranking is severely restricted.  

 

Structurally, except for the east wing fourth floor roof, the C&SS building is sound.   However, mechanical systems have outlived their normal lifetime cycle.  As in the Hornbake Library, the 23 year mechanical design life-cycle has been exceeded.  The electrical systems were not designed for today’s Unix workstation/server world. 

 

Asbestos inhibits repair work throughout most of the floors, restricting normal preventive maintenance and repairs of existing environmental systems on each floor.  This has led to further deterioration of piping and other mechanical systems to the point that repairs are no longer viable.   To wait longer to renovate could necessitate the demolition of the entire east wing of the building.  

 

Cosmetically, the appearance of the building could be greatly improved.  The building is depressing in appearance with smooth green block hallways that cannot be painted properly.  The restrooms are not ADA compliant.    When visitors and prospective recruits – faculty, staff and students –  enter the C&SS Building, the first reaction is usually negative.  

 

This project will afford the opportunity to install high speed data lines/links throughout the east wing, which could ameliorate telecommunication inadequacies and improve research capabilities. 

 

 

 

 

 

PROPOSED INFRASTRUCTURE CONCENTRATION

 

The reason renewal of the C&SS east wing is proposed rather than renewal for the entire C&SS building or for another wing is as follows:

1.                  the level of problems and deterioration of the infrastructure in this wing exceeds the other wings,

2.                  costs to renovate the entire C&SS building in one project may be prohibitive,

3.                  mechanical and electrical systems were previously upgraded and sized to handle several floors of the C&SS west wing (old building) – primarily for OIT,

4.                  the projected emergence of the Physical Sciences Complex in parking Lot DD which will replace the IPST building next to the eastern wing,

5.                  the need to reinvigorate all mechanical/electrical systems in the building after 35+ years,

6.                  further delay in infrastructure renovations may require complete “gutting” of the facility or even total demolition and replacement of the building, and

7.                  the east wing is fully occupied by CMPS faculty and staff.

 

PROCESS

 

As part of Dean Haperin’s initiative to review all existing CMPS facilities—

a CMPS Facilities Task Force was formed by Associate Dean, Ron Lipsman to review present CMPS facilities and to recommend a comprehensive Facility Plan.  This Task Force recommended a three prong attack for consolidating and obtaining new or renovated facilities for CMPS’s Physical Sciences, Computer Sciences and Earth Sciences.   The first two of these have already been dealt with by the Campus, and corresponding items now appear on the Capital Budget.  The third is addressed in a companion proposal. 

 

During its activity, the Task Force also encountered an overwhelming theme: namely, the deteriorating facilities in which many CMPS units reside.  The number one problem building mentioned was the C&SS Building.   This proposal focuses on the rejuvenation of that building, especially its east wing.

 

The CMPS Facilities Director contacted Facilities Operations & Maintenance (O&M)  Director, Jack Baker, and Assistant Directors, John Vucci and Marlowe Leafty,  specifically about the C&SS Building.  Facilities Campus Projects Planning and other O&M support staff were also consulted.    Separate walkthroughs with the Assistant Director, HVAC Systems, John Vucci, and  Assistant Director, Utilities, Marlowe Leafty ensued.  Both concurred that the C&SS Building east wing needed a serious infrastructure overhaul and upgrade to meet today’s and future facilities needs.   These personnel made concrete recommendations providing direction for a renewal and  upgrade project.   

 

Dr. Lipsman directed Tim Falkinburg, CMPS Facilities Director, to form an Advisory Committee concerning the C&SS building.    The following plan is the product of the Advisory Committee’s work, aided by the advice of various Facilities personnel.  See Appendix D for minutes of the Advisory Committee’s activities.

PLAN

 

The proposed plan is envisioned as a multi step project. 

 

Infrastructure Study

The first step is to initiate a study of the mechanical and electrical systems – particularly the mechanical systems.  Excellent information was provided by the leaders of the Facilities O&M, HVAC and Electrical units.   See Appendix C.  This consultation confirmed that the environmental systems are antiquated, inefficient, deteriorating, inadequate and in many places patched.  The mechanical systems are a hodge-podge of different, inefficient, overlapping systems sometimes competing with each other.  The Advisory Committee concurs with the O&M experts that the C&SS Building east wing’s existing environmental systems need replacement and significant upgrades. 

 

To assist in a holistic review of all the mechanical/electrical systems in this wing, the committee’s plan includes engaging an outside consultant, expert in mechanical, electrical and piping systems.  The consultant will be requested to examine the existing systems, detailing their specifications and indicating their condition.  Then the consultant will be requested to provide a report on what systems should be replaced, what systems can be kept (if any) and how they will be best integrated with the new environmental systems.  In addition, advice from the consultant on how renovations might be best staged to minimize disruptions and maximize continued use of the building will be requested.

 

Project Resource Plan

The second step is to develop an overall Project Resource plan.   Besides contractor materials and resources, the plan must take into account the need to minimize disruptions to residents in the east wing and the rest of the building.   Some shut down of activities in the east wing will occur.  The extent needs to be estimated and minimized.  Staging the renovations to minimize disruptions should be a key element of the Project Resource Plan.  This plan should be developed in combination with our Facilities Planning, C&SS Advisory Committee and CMPS Facilities staff working together with the consultant.

 

Elements

The third step is to work with the architect/engineer designers to prepare the various elements of the proposed renovations.   Elements include but are not limited to:

·        asbestos abatement

·        demolition

·        mechanical systems

·        electrical systems

·        fourth floor roof

·        transformer room

·        telecommunications and high speed data links

·        qualitative improvements   

The actual renovation construction may need to be staged over two to three fiscal years. 

 

Asbestos Abatement:  The advisory committee believes that this is not an infrastructure issue.  They strongly believe that this activity should be immediately completed by the University outside of this proposed project.  It is included only in the event that this activity is not completed prior to the actual renovations of the project because little demolition or construction work can be accomplished if asbestos ceiling tile, pipe covering, etc. remain in the wing. 

 

Demolition:  Based on the mechanical, electrical and architectural design plans, existing systems will need to be demolished.  The staging plan will determine the extent and timing of the demolition.  There may be multiple demolitions based on the staging plan.  

 

Mechanical System:    Completely renewing mechanical systems is a priority.  This includes all hvac, chillers, air handlers, reheat, ducting, window units and piping systems.   The recommendation from Facilities, with which the Advisory Committee concurs, is to use the new C&SS SCUB for heat/cooling exchange and pumping systems.  This approach should help to minimize disruptions to the residents of the C&SS Building during installation, since the heavy activity should occur outside of the east wing.   This SCUB approach should also handle and integrate with the Physical Sciences Complex once that is constructed. Original programming of the CSS-SCUB provides for shell space to add equipment to support this multiple building support concept.   Employing “first costs” in utilizing the SCUB should provide the campus overall mechanical savings, efficiencies, and future maintenance.

 

Electrical Systems:  Upgrading electrical systems throughout the wing is important to meet today’s research requirements.  This includes: major new electrical circuit panels in the transformer room, new and upgraded circuit panels and PDU’s throughout the wing, new UPS/batteries, new UPS wiring including UPS lines to computer and laboratories as well as key offices, new generator and double feeds, and new lighting in most labs and offices. 

 

Fourth Floor Roof: The structural integrity of the fourth floor roof needs to be studied.  Once the heavy pumps and steel grids are removed from the penthouse, crack(s) in concrete ceilings where oil and water penetrate into the fourth floor must be repaired. 

 

Transformer Room:  Weatherproof the current transformer room in the basement to insure integrity of existing transformers and major building circuit breaker panels.  

 

Telecommunications/High Speed Data Links:  The need to upgrade the data wiring (100 meg fiber) throughout the wing to the labs and offices in support of present and proposed research is paramount.

 

Qualitative Hallways & Universal Areas Improvement: Wallboard and paint all hallways,  meeting and conference rooms; restroom renewal to meet today’s standards – providing ADA compliance; and, enhance all stairways with materials or paint in today’s styles will go a long way to improve first appearances to new and prospective faculty and students.  Replace or repair windows.  Replace or install new custom screens in all windows, particularly where none exist now.  Paint offices and labs as renovation work completes.

 

Staging

Final staging of the various tasks and activities will need to wait until after the consultant report and for renovation plans by the various mechanical, electrical and architectural designers.  Nevertheless, a very rough staging proposal is as follows:

 

Year One         Consultant study/report, project planning, asbestos abatement, ceiling tile & light replacements, weatherproof transformer room, and telecommunications upgrade

Year Two         Demolition for mechanical, mechanical system replacements, and repair fourth floor roof

Year Three       Upgrade electrical systems and qualitative architectural improvements

 

COST ESTIMATE

The cost estimate provided below is essentially a “wag”.   Facilities personnel were  consulted and provided their best estimate.   We have augmented these original “guesses” to be on the conservative (high) side.  Inflation factors and various fees have not been taken into account.

I.          YEAR ONE

Consultant Study                                                                                              50k

                Project Resource Planning                                                                                50k

Asbestos Abatement    

1.         Hallways & open spaces, floors 1, 3, &4 replace tile and fixtures           150k

2.         Offices & labs, floors 0,1,3, 4 & part of basement                                 300k

3.         Remove/replace piping insulation                                                            50k

Weatherproof Transformer room – ventilate & repair water issues                       50k

Telecommunications- install 100 megabit cabling & equipment               300k

            SUB-TOTAL                                                                            950k

II.         YEAR TWO

Mechanical Systems, Floors 0-4;  Basement appears OK.

            1.         New chiller in C&SS SCUB, heat exchange & piping             1,000k

2.         Demolish pumps, chillers, piping in penthouse                            100k

            3.         Repair floor in penthouse                                                                        50k

            4.         Eliminate/demolish all window units & piping                             100k

5.         Replace corroded piping in wing                                                           100k

            6.         Replace air handlers floors 1-4.                                                 400k

            7.         Install variable air volume air side distribution system

with variable speed drives-  all remaining floors                         150k

8.         Controls to ODC                                                                                  150k

9.         Replace perimeter fan coil units with 4-pipe units                                   200k

            10.       New duct work                                                                                    100k                                     SUB TOTAL                                                                                             2,350K

III.       YEAR THREE

            Electrical Systems,  all six floors

1.            UPS/batteries & generator connections, plus new feeds to

          Floor closets                                                                               300k

2.         Generator, combine for entire C&SS building 500kw-1mw                   300k

3.         PDU for all floors, 15k x 6 floors + hookups                                         100k

4.         New Electrical panels on each floor, 2k x 2each x 5floors                        30k

5.         Individual sub stations, 5 x 30k                                                 150k

6.         Rewiring existing & new wiring for UPS plus outlets                  100k

            Other Work

1.         Bathroom renovation, 20k x 2 x 5 floors                                               200k

2.                  Wallboard and paint all hallways,  70k x 6 floors                                   420k

3.                  New windows and screens                                                                   200k   

4.                  Paint Offices and Labs                                                                50k

                        SUB TOTAL                                                                         1,850K

 

TOTAL ESTIMATED COST                                                                       5,150K

 

Note:    Above estimated costs do not reflect design, facilities, or contingency fees,  inflation, or if necessary temporarily relocation of faculty and staff to a surge building.